Article-1
Bullying tactics:
on Trump targeting Europe
Trump’s weaponisation
of tariffs over Greenland could undermine NATO
The Trump administration has vowed to
slap a raft of European countries with a 10% tariff on “any and all goods”
beginning on February 1 which is then set to increase to 25% on June 1, until
an agreement is reached on the U.S. demand to purchase or otherwise
acquire the Denmark-administered Arctic territory of Greenland. The latest
round of tariffs will add to existing 15% U.S.-imposed trade duties on the
countries targeted by the White House, which include Denmark, Finland,
France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. While
French President Emmanuel Macron described the U.S. action as “unacceptable”,
U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the move was “completely wrong”. The
targeted nations have sent a small number of troops to Greenland for
what they have called a reconnaissance mission, essentially for military
exercises that signal and reinforce Europe’s collective commitment to defending
the autonomous Arctic territory. Such emphasis by the European Union (EU)
clearly reflects concern stemming from the fact that American troops
recently entered Venezuela and kidnapped and transported its President Nicolás
Maduro to the U.S., and Mr. Trump has since gone on record effectively
warning that he might consider intervention — for different purposes and in
different circumstances — in Colombia, Cuba, Mexico and Iran next.
Leaving aside the neo-imperialist
impulse that is implicit in the Trump administration’s plans to control
non-allied nations’ territories based on the threat of military action, or to
bully allies by weaponising tariffs against them, such actions are tantamount
to a violation of international law, and in the case of the EU, risk degrading
years of progress made on transatlantic trade agreements. First, there is a
serious issue of no legislative backing by the U.S. Congress and legal basis
for the unilateral action taken by the Trump administration in targeting
Denmark and other European countries. Second, the Trump administration is
likely to face, this week, a judicial ruling against its use of the
International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs across the board.
Third, European nations may bring into force what is known as the
“anti-coercion instrument”, a counter-tariff facility that would limit the
trade of major U.S. tech firms and related service providers that conduct
significant business in the EU. Whatever the denouement of this Trump-made
conflict, it will likely take years, if not decades to heal the worsening
transatlantic rift that has beset the region. Meanwhile a weakened NATO will
stand less able to assist Ukraine in facing off against the depredations of an
aggressive Russia on the eastern front. The need of the hour is enlightened
leadership, a far cry from what is presently on offer in Washington.
Vocabulary — Article 1
- 1. Weaponisation — हथियार के रूप में प्रयोग — militarisation, exploitation
- 2. Raft — बड़ी संख्या/ढेर — multitude, large number
- 3. Impose — थोपना/लगाना — levy, enforce
- 4. Acquire — हासिल करना — obtain, procure
- 5. Reconnaissance — टोह/जासूसी सर्वेक्षण — surveillance, scouting
- 6. Autonomous — स्वायत्त — self-governing, independent
- 7. Implicit — अंतर्निहित — implied, unspoken
- 8. Weaponising — हथियार की तरह इस्तेमाल करना — exploiting, instrumentalising
- 9. Tantamount — समान/बराबर — equivalent, identical
- 10. Unilateral — एकतरफा — one-sided, solo
- 11. Denouement — निष्कर्ष/अंतिम परिणाम — outcome, resolution
- 12. Depredations — लूटपाट/विनाशकारी हमला — ravages, devastation
Article-2
Crisis in education: On the Supreme Court, higher education and student well-being
Higher
education institutions need systemic reforms
In an ongoing
case relating to student
suicides, the Supreme Court of India has issued nine directions to
Central and State governments. Recognising the massification of higher education front-ended
by privatisation without a commensurate boost in quality, the Court has taken
note of student distress covering financial, social, social injustice and
academic issues. The Court has invoked Article 142 of the Constitution and
seven of the nine directions relate to record-keeping, reporting, and tracking
suicides in higher education institutions (HEI) separately. Two directives
order the filling of the posts of Registrars and Vice-Chancellors as well as
all vacant faculty positions. Evidently, the Court sees these steps as critical
to student well-being.
Across India, ground reportage shows
that many public HEIs, especially universities, report 50% vacancies. The
University of Madras is a case study as it is the premier State-administered
HEI in Tamil Nadu — a State which leads the nation in enrolment in higher education
and with a stellar record in women’s education. With such a storied legacy, the
university was known for quality research besides awarding degrees in
affiliated colleges through examinations. Teaching became an important
component in the late 1970s, but in the last decade, its decline has been
pronounced. No new faculty appointments have been made and the teaching
strength is half of the sanctioned strength. The university’s research
component is just about functional. It boasts of centres for advanced studies
such as in philosophy, botany and mathematics, but these are a shadow of their
original selves. Today, the humanities, science-based and social science
research focused on Tamil Nadu, that the government can leverage from its
public universities, has been given short shrift. Vice-Chancellor appointments have been stalled by a
recalcitrant Governor. The ambiguity thrown in by the Court on the Presidential reference on a Governor’s powers may
need to be resolved before Vice-Chancellor vacancies can be quickly filled.
Filling faculty positions would have to follow UGC process that takes at least
six months and a budgetary commitment that may be helped with Union government
support. Availability of qualified faculty can be a hurdle. Corruption and political-ideological
appointments have affected quality and need to be addressed. Although the
four-month schedule prescribed by the Court might seem daunting, the order is a
call to action to fulfil the basic requirements of a robust public higher
education system before goals such as Viksit Bharat can be seriously aspired
for.
Vocabulary — Article 2
1. Massification
— व्यापक विस्तार/जनसुलभीकरण — expansion,
democratisation
2.
Commensurate
— अनुपातिक/समानुपाती — proportionate,
corresponding
3.
Invoked
— आह्वान किया/लागू किया — cited, called upon
4.
Directives
— निर्देश/आदेश — orders, instructions
5.
Vacancy
— रिक्ति — empty post, opening
6.
Premier
— अग्रणी/प्रमुख — leading, foremost
7.
Stellar
— उत्कृष्ट/उत्कृष्टतम — outstanding,
remarkable
8.
Legacy
— विरासत — heritage, tradition
9.
Pronounced
— स्पष्ट/प्रमुख — marked, noticeable
10.
Sanctioned
— स्वीकृत/मंजूर — approved, authorised
11.
Leveraged
— उपयोग में लाना/फायदा उठाना — utilised, exploited
12.
Short
shrift — उपेक्षा/कम महत्व देना — neglect, disregard
13.
Recalcitrant
— अड़ियल/हठी — stubborn, defiant
14.
Ambiguity
— अस्पष्टता — uncertainty, vagueness
15.
Daunting
— डरावना/कठिन — intimidating, challenging
16.
Robust
— मजबूत/सुदृढ़ — strong, resilient

Banking Learners provides expert guidance for IBPS PO, SBI PO, Clerk, and other banking exams. Get study tips, current affairs, and strategies from Banking Learners